The TRX Newsroom
Product updates. Partnership announcements. Where we'll be next. And long-form perspective on how courts are modernizing the record itself.
Stay current
Stay updated with more news from TRX.
We use your email only for the TRX Record. Unsubscribe in one click.
Reading is one thing. A 30-minute walkthrough tailored to your court is another.
Access to justice usually centers on representation and court fees. The court record rarely comes up, but for anyone trying to appeal, the cost and delay of obtaining a certified transcript can decide the case before its merits are ever heard.
Showing 6 of 27
California's Supreme Court unanimously ruled that when no court reporter is available, trial courts must create an official verbatim record by electronic recording for civil litigants who cannot afford one, a narrow exception to the state's longtime ban. This edition gathers the opinion and the coverage explaining what it changes for the court record.
An Indiana appellate court flags apparent AI errors in a court reporter's transcript, Arizona rules that citing fake AI cases is sanctionable regardless of intent, and an Ohio suit tests whether AI transcripts are discoverable like email. The thread this edition: courts are putting the accountability on the person using the tool, not the tool itself.
A great week in Jacksonville with court staff from across the country. Thank you to everyone who stopped by.
Electronic Business Systems (EBS), a Baton Rouge–based provider of court recording technology with more than 50 years of service to judicial, city, and federal courts, joins the TRX Partner Program to give courts a connected path from recorded proceeding to delivered transcript.
California admits to high-risk AI it said it didn't have, Maryland counts more than 50 agencies already using AI, and a legal-tech acquisition extends the consolidation Yale warned about. The thread this edition: adoption is outrunning the transparency meant to govern it.
A written AI policy gives you legal cover and a false sense that the risk is handled. It does nothing to keep sealed court data out of public models. Here is why governing the tools your people already use beats banning them.
